|
|
|
Tips from the Region III Meeting of the
National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA)
|
|
|
|
Last week, four research
administrators from Clemson University attended the regional meeting
of the National Council of University Research Administrators (NCURA)
in Memphis, Tennessee. Trisha Southergill and Hagan Walker from
Grant Support Services and Lynn Kunkle and Mandy McClasan from the
Office of Sponsored Programs returned with some valuable guidance on
the current funding environment.
• With fewer dollars and staff
to review grant applications due to sequestration, more agencies are
likely to restrict the number of applications that institutions can
submit for an award competition. These restricted competitions
frequently use the terms, “limited submissions”, or “internal
coordination required” in the application guidelines. OSP
attempts to identify these opportunities as soon as they are
released, but this is not always possible. If you come across
this language, please contact Mandy
McCaslan in the Office of Sponsored Programs to
coordinate these opportunities for you. OSP can facilitate
meetings that bring together all parties interested in an opportunity
to determine whether or not different ideas can be joined into one
application. For Clemson's Limited Submission postings, visit
our website.
• In his workshop entitled, "The Other
Side of Grantsmanship: Contacting the Program Officers and Thinking
Like a Reviewer," Dr. Robert Porter, Director of Research
Development at the University of Tennessee, notes that 50% of funded
proposals at the National Science Foundation were unsolicited;
otherwise, not in response to a particular solicitation.
Investigators are strongly encouraged to advance their ideas to NSF
Program Officers, who are often looking for information on what new
ideas are emerging in higher education.
• In his Keynote address, Ed Chaum, M.D.,
Ph.D., Plough Foundation Professor of Retinal Diseases, noted that
projects that are most likely to be funded by both public and private
entities exhibit the following characteristics: they are
translational, multidisciplinary, important, innovative and clearly
demonstrate how they will have a significant impact on a problem or
issue.
• In a webcast with NSF,
it was announced that an updated Proposal
and Award Policies and Procedures Guide is currently
being drafted. It will be posted for Public Comment in June.
|
|
Hot Topic: Reform of Administrative
Requirements on Federal Awards
Last week’s edition of Research
Roar featured an account of how the National Science Board is
reviewing the administrative burden on principal investigators in
applying for and managing federal grants. This discussion is
related to the larger effort initiated by the Office of Management
and Budget to look at reforming administrative requirements on
federal grants that relate to proposal preparation, regulatory
compliance, and award management. The Council on Governmental
Relations (COGR), of which Clemson University is a participating
member, has issued a draft response to OMB’s reform proposals.
Representatives from research administration have reviewed the COGR
draft and are in the process of preparing a response, concurring with
the majority of COGR’s recommendations for change, and indicating in
specific areas where concern remains. In summary, the major
administrative reforms that Clemson supports include the following:
·
Direct charging of
administrative/clerical support in grant budgets, but with specific
guidelines on when these charges can be in order to avoid any
hidden administrative burden inherent in this change;
·
Eliminate the Faculty
and Institutional Burden of Effort Reporting
·
Removal of voluntary
cost-share requirements in agency solicitations, and relatedly, allow
institutions to recover their full Facilities and Administrative rate
(indirect costs).
·
90-Day Advance Notice
for Application Submission Deadlines
·
Elimination of deadline
times after local 4:59pm
Sheila Lischwe, Director of the
Office of Sponsored Programs, and Tracy Arwood, Director of the
Office of Research Compliance, will attend COGR’s quarterly meeting
in June, where these issues will continue to be discussed. If
you would like to read the full COGR draft response, please contact Mandy
McClasan in OSP.
|
|
Informational Webinars on Fullbright-Hays
Program
|
|
|
|
The Fiscal Year 2013
competition for the Fulbright-Hays Group Projects Abroad (GPA)
Program short-term projects was announced in the Federal Register on
April 17, 2013. The deadline date for submitting applications is June
13, 2013.
The International Studies Division is
pleased to annouce the following informational webinars for the
Fiscal Year 2013 GPA Program short-term projects competition:
Thursday, May 16 at 12 noon EDT
Tuesday, May 21 at 1:30 EDT
Thursday, May 23 at 1:30 EDT
GPA short-term projects provides support for
overseas projects in training, research, and curriculum development
in modern foreign languages and area studies for teachers, students,
and faculty engaged in a common endeavor. Projects may include
short-term seminars, curriculum development, or group research/study.
To register for these webinars, and for
additional information on how to apply to the program, please go to http://www2.ed.gov/programs/iegpsgpa/applicant.html.
|
|
|
|
|
|